Here is Jeff Martz's recent reconstruction of the aetosaur Rioarribasuchus chamaensis.
I think that this new reconstruction is probably fairly accurate given what we know about Rioarribasuchus and other paratypothoracisin aetosaurs, and it contrasts strongly from other reconstructions that still portray it as a Desmatosuchus-like aetosaur. This relationship was refuted by phylogenetic analysis, and although I really like Matt Celeskey's artwork, the reconstruction as a desmatosuchine is not based upon any actually recovered fossil material. All of the osteoderms with spines in the Rioarribasuchus type material are paramedian plates from the caudal region and nothing homologous with the cervical lateral spines in Desmatosuchus are known.
Parker, W. G. 2007. Reassessment of the Aetosaur 'Desmatosuchus' chamaensis with a
reanalysis of the phylogeny of the Aetosauria (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 5:41-68. DOI: 10.1017/S1477201906001994
A new kind of problem
14 hours ago in RRResearch