One of the bigger Triassic mysteries is why cynodonts are so common in the Newark Supergroup, while completely lacking in the presumably contemporaneous Chinle Formation (despite what you saw on 'Walking With Dinosaurs').
Sues, H.-D., and J. A. Hopson. 2010. Anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Boreogomphodon jeffersoni (Cynodontia: Gomphodontia) from the Upper Triassic of Virginia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30:1202 – 1220. DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2010.483545
Abstract - We present a detailed account on the skeletal structure of the traversodont cynodont Boreogomphodon jeffersoni on the basis of a considerable quantity of excellently preserved craniodental remains and several referred postcranial bones from the Tomahawk Creek Member of the Vinita Formation (Upper Triassic: Carnian) of the Richmond basin (Newark Supergroup) in eastern Virginia. The small size, proportionately short snout and mandible, low number of molariform postcanine teeth, and presence of up to three sectorial postcanines all indicate that most of the specimens recovered to date represent immature individuals. The superbly preserved dental material permits detailed inferences regarding tooth replacement and dental function during ontogeny. Boreogomphodon differs from other known traversodont cynodonts primarily in the possession of lower molariform postcanine teeth with three rather than two anterior cusps in all but the smallest specimens, zygomatic arches that are bowed laterally at about mid-length, and pronounced, irregular sculpturing on the dorsal surface of the snout. Plesiomorphic features of traversodont cynodonts retained by Boreogomphodon include the position of the paracanine fossa anterolingual to the upper canine as well as the presence of a distinct central cusp and a posterior cingulum on the upper molariform postcanines. Phylogenetic analysis suggests the existence of a clade comprising Boreogomphodon plus two other taxa (Arctotraversodon and Nanogomphodon) in the Northern Hemisphere that is the sister group to most other known Middle and Late Triassic traversodonts from Gondwana.
Field of Science
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Even Earlier Discovery of Antibiotic Resistance1 day ago in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
-
Religion is halfway between a fact and an opinion - according to kids and adults3 days ago in Epiphenom
-
Bioengineers go retro to build a calculator from living cells3 days ago in The Allotrope
-
-
A New Non-mammaliaform Eucynodont from the Ischigualasto Formation of Argentina1 week ago in Chinleana
-
-
Chemistry, fluid dynamics and an awful radioactive mess1 week ago in The Curious Wavefunction
-
Exploding expertise2 weeks ago in The Culture of Chemistry
-
-
-
-
-
UPDATED: 10 things we need to find out about the #NCoV1 month ago in Rule of 6ix
-
-
-
-
-
The Lure of the Obscure? Guest Post by Frank Stahl11 months ago in Sex, Genes & Evolution
-
-
Finding a new translation factor, and verifying it with help from my experimental friends1 year ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
Free ImageJ Macro -- for citing images1 year ago in Skeptic Wonder
-
-
-
The Large Picture Blog Has Moved1 year ago in The Large Picture Blog
-
Lab Rat Moving House1 year ago in Life of a Lab Rat
-
Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs1 year ago in Disease Prone
-
Branson getting into microbial diversity in the deep sea2 years ago in The Greenhouse
3 comments:
Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Different environment? Not as in geological but rather biome?
ReplyDeleteMaybe but they have similar pollen, so the flora is close but not the fauna.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like the fauna has a different origin. Laurasia vs Gondwana.
ReplyDeleteWhat do the isotopes and mineral deposits indicate? Are they similar in aridity? Paleosols have given hints, iirc, about temperature and humidity. Are there any good samples? What about altitude?